History

E and D have two children, both loved and cherished, protected and respected, up to some extent. L and L love their parents and the family has one thing in common with all other families and one not very common thing, L is older than their parents and L and L do not like each other on occasion.


D is allegedly the result of a delicious yet rotten apple, philosophically perfectly valid, quite logic in fact. On the contrary, L has always been there, somehow quietly, only acting when its sibling cannot stand any more the pressure given by E or D, or sometimes both.

E is a spoiled child, always on a quest for satisfaction, for comfort and happiness, one that does not recognise inside as it always considers itself as unique as nothing, while occupying billions of vessels at the same time and at different times. E feeds D as well D spoils E and E + E is 2E according to L, but according to L, E + E is E, though D would highly disagree.

E and D love each other, but only as L has taught them. They do not understand that they can't exist if they were to love each other as L has tried to teach them. However, only L can live forever, no matter how much E and D try to survive, they can only change vessel, momentarily, while D mumbles around between one of its faces and the other. At the end, they all, except L, are slaves of T, which has been since the beginning and shall be till the end. Yet, T is a mirror, a projection of E loving D, equally deceitful, equally ignorant and ultimately equally unreal, cause only L exists, no matter how much L try to explain it cause L believes than E + E is D and don't realise that behind all fancy L and all deceitful T, only lies L.

Love & Logic

One plus one is not two. The world's oldest ruler has found it fit to spread itself to every corner of our minds. The old ruler believes itself an absolute, while its mere nature denies its eternity, denies its infinity. Extremes collide in the most beautiful moments, those that defy the logic of duality. Are hate and love so different? Are peace and chaos? Are mathematics wrong?

In a futile attempt of being actually true to our real nature, our logic was introduced with the idea of balance, such a rare outlier, in which equilibrium exists and extremes merge into unity. But how far can we take such idea?, do you recognise yourself in the mirror, do your eyes perceive those others wandering the same streets? Can you think about yourself without being yourself?  Can you get outside and inside of your own logic ? Can you bring a new one, a better and worse one? Can logic exist in a world free of all slavers? Can you be beyond duality, beyond time, beyond space, beyond individuality?

It is logical to survive, it is logical to reproduce, to find comfort, it is logical to judge, to classify, to summarise, to ignore. Isn't it always 50 / 50, isn't it always 2, isn't it always good or bad? What about perspective?, that seems to be the only new discovery, relativity, probabilistic existence and motion, the observer affecting reality.

It is not logical no, it is not logical to look at someone's eyes and see yourself as if you were not yourself, to feel yourself and themselves as one, out of those walls you have placed strategically, out of that body and that mind you claim to be yourself, inside those cells you believe to be part of you, far and close to those that you love, that you miss, far, close, inside, outside, now, before, after yourself, after themselves.

It is not logical no, it is not logical to scream in silence and to hear it in the noise, it is not logical no, to sacrifice your life in exchange of nothing, in exchange of everything. Isn't it always 50/50? Isn't it always one plus one equal to two? But that cannot be true, oh no, it cannot, because one plus one is not two, one plus one is one, just as love is, it is simply one.